Different Blowing Techniques for Palaeolithic Aerophones: Animal Calls, Clarinets, and Flutes

Authors

  • Michael Praxmarer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1553/JMA-001-03

Keywords:

Blowing techni c s for Upper Palaelithic aerophones, perforated mammal bones, ulna wing bones, radius wing bones, flutes and reeds, mirlitons

Abstract

This article examines how individual approaches in experimental music archaeology may produce different results in reconstructing Upper Palaeolithic aerophones. The paper reveals how sound tools have been used by both prehistoric and modern hunters to imitate animal calls or to chase their prey in a specific direction. The best examples of such practices are the phalangeal whistles and a possible scraper, which have been found along with the remains of Neanderthals in Europe. A possible scraper was recently discovered in the Middle Stone Age African Border cave. Early percussion instruments like drums or different kinds of idiophones might have had multiple functions for the nomadic hunters.

From the 1990s to 2009 a number of new finds of possible Palaeolithic aerophones initiated various experimental studies. Unfortunately, many important questions could not be resolved. I intend to revive the discussions on playing techniques on one hand, and to contribute to the arguments for the non-human origin of some finds on the other.

After discussing sound production techniques of simulated animal calls and summarising the possible use of sound-producers as hunting tools, this article briefly presents two possible reconstructions with reeds and two different techniques of blowing a flute without any mouthpiece.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-04

How to Cite

Praxmarer, Michael. 2023. “Different Blowing Techniques for Palaeolithic Aerophones: Animal Calls, Clarinets, and Flutes”. Journal of Music Archaeology 1 (December). Vienna, Austria:39-57. https://doi.org/10.1553/JMA-001-03.

Issue

Section

Articles